So, the left was all a-flutter that the FBI had declared they had learned of a "credible and widespread threat" against Jewish houses of Worship in New Jersey, most conveniently close to the election.
Shortly after that announcement got broacast in the news near and far, the threat then apparently went away as it was apparently neither quite that credible nor that widespread. It turns out to be to be a single source, a single autistic individual living at home posted a threat online and ckaimed he never ws actually plannign to do anything, and that he is now in the words of the FBI - "no longer a threat to the community".
Most convenient, that.
So, some Jews being warned of such a credible and widespread threat would like to carry firearms for the defense of themselves and their congregations in New York. After all, it seems only common-sense that in the face of credible threats of violence one should be allowed the practical tools to defend themselves.
Well, they can't.
Bearing Arms: NYS Jewish Gun Club’s scathing response to non-action of court
New York's law prohibiting lawful citizens from carrying firearms in houses of worship, currently being fought in the courts, though the courts are slow walking the cases, is asinine and leaves people disarmed and vulnerable to criminal attack from those who will not obey such laws.
Democrats quite simply would prefer dead Jews who were unable to defend themselves to armed Jews.
That's unacceptable.
2 comments:
Are you surprised? I'm not...
Old NFO: Sadly no. The Democrats and anti-gunners will slow-walk and actively continue to try and block and prevent people from having and exercising their fundamental rights much as they have done in the past.
Post a Comment