On today's legal soap opera: Like sands through the hourglass, these are the statutes of limitations.
Yep another hapless potential client lost to the sands of bad timing, on their part. Even better, I told him in writing of the time limit - twice!
Our potential but not retained client had his concealed pistol license denied.
The denial is due to the CPL clerk misreading the disqualifying statutes and thinking something he did fits the definition, which it actually dies not. In short this is a very winnable case and the denial can be fixed because -
There's an appeals process for a denial, and the appeal must be filed within 21 days from the denial or it is lost.
Remember the 21 day part, it's kinda important.
When he first called, he was 60 days past his denial. As such, do not pass go, do not file appeal, as 60 is greater than 21, you're over 21 days, no point paying me to tell you you've lost, you've lost.
I explain this to him and reiterate the importance of appealing within 21 days of the denial, and tell him to apply again to get denied again if they deny for the same reason so we can appeal a fresh denial.
He agrees to do so and I send him a retainer letter and he states he will apply and retain me then. He doesn't sign or return the retainer, nor pay the rather modest retainer amount, and as such I assume he doesn't want me to fix this problem for him.
He just called me today. He last applied in January and was duly denied on January 31, 2020.
While you may have been told there would be no math in this post dear readers, all of you (I hope) instinctively know without even looking at a calendar, nor counting on your fingers, nor on your phones, that there are more than 21 days between any day in January and March 10.
Counting days is apparently very hard. Sheesh.
3 comments:
Hey Aaron;
You can fix stupid.
Supposed to be "Can't" Durn fat fingers
MrGarabaldi: I sometimes can and often do fix stupid - it just costs a lot more in time, money and aggravation to get there.
Post a Comment