Showing posts with label Warren. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Warren. Show all posts

Friday, July 11, 2025

Surprise! Criminals And Their Families Lie.

I mean, who knew that criminals and their families might be less than forthcoming with the truth about an incident?

In this particular scenario, the criminal in question, Rakim Wright, did it wrong.

Fleeing from police after a domestic violence call and  shooting at them while doing so, then shooting himself before he could be arrested, resulting in Rakim assuming room temperature and leaving one less violent domestic abuser in the world.

Meanwhile, in an attempt to whip up a "hands up don't shoot" false narrative, and a shot at winning the ghetto lottery, witnesses and family claimed that "Wright was unarmed and shot by the officers".

 The police video of the incident shows otherwise: 

Fox 2 Detroit:  Video shows Warren domestic violence suspect fatally shooting self after firing at police during chase

 Yes criminals lie, their family lies, and witnesses lie. 

We will note this was not Wright's first time of doing things wrong, but it was his last:

Wright also had previous arrests for assault with a dangerous weapon, malicious destruction of property, and felony weapons charges.  

Wednesday, September 02, 2020

Chalk Another One Up For The Good Guys

The Detroit News: Deceased suspect in robbery at Roseville car wash identified as Detroit teen

2 attackers try to rob a car wash customer at gun point.      The customer happens to be legally armed,  shoots back and nailed at least one of the attackers, who later died.

 Police say they've identified the suspect who was shot and killed during an alleged attempted robbery at a car wash Tuesday as a 16-year-old male from Detroit.

 Authorities say they also are looking for a second suspect in the attempted robbery.

 Excellent result from an armed law-abiding citizen.

Thursday, June 11, 2020

If You Pass A Law, Expect It To Be Enforced

When you pass a law, no matter how it may appear stupid or be for an offense most people would deem at most a minor annoyance, stupid, or even for things that shouldn't be an offense at all, expect that law to be enforced.

Take parking your vehicle, in this case a delivery van, with your wheel on the curb for example.

In Warren, as in most cities of this state and elsewhere, that is actually against the law. You can be ticketed for doing so. It's a civil infraction so you pay a fine and learn not to do it again. Is this a dumb law? Depends on who you ask.

Of course, in the current racially-charged environment, when an officer enforces such a law and the law-breaker happens to be Black, and said Black person then refuses to cooperate with producing his license, refuses further to the point of arrest, then resists arrest, and ends with getting taken to the ground, and being cuffed and stuffed into a police car, the outrage machine goes into action.

The Detroit News: Police investigate incident involving white Warren officer, black delivery driver

Yep, it's may be a stupid offense, but it is the law and there very well may be reasons for it, and if you have a law it will at some point be enforced.

Once the officer informed the driver of the offense and asked the driver for his license, and the driver decided to refuse to provide it and further resist, it went downhill and ended in his arrest.

That refusal to cooperate with providing a driver's license turned a stupid ordinance civil infraction ticket to charges of failing to produce a drivers license and felony resisting arrest.

Of course, the outrage machine then kicked into high gear, demanding the officer being fired, and James Fouts, the Mayor of Warren then tried to get in front of the mob by demanding the officer's firing:

"I have spoken with Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer and have ordered that this officer be terminated immediately."
"I have zero tolerance for this disgusting act against an innocent person. If the last two weeks have taught us anything, it is that bad behavior by ANY police officer will not be tolerated!
"The policy of the Warren Police Department and the training provided to every officer is to deescalate every situation. This officer did not follow policy or his training and is not fit to serve the citizens in Warren."

The only deescalation would have been to ignore the offense in the first place, or perhaps walk away after the refusal of the driver to provide his license after being asked. In which case, the problem is with the law not the officer.

The Mayor then took down his Facebook post demanding the firing likely after being more fully told of what transpired and facts began to trump the outrage.

However, about a half-hour after, Fouts asked media to wait to disseminate the information. He also removed the Facebook page post.
Later, the mayor posted a new statement on Facebook: "The previous post regarding an altercation was taken down at the request of the Warren Police Commissioner. I await further details based upon additional information.

In other words, he bashed one of his police officers and called for his firing based on second-or-third-hand outrage and a lack of actual information. Way to go there.

Mayor Fouts, if he's truly outraged about this situation would be far better off rescinding the city's law about parking on curbs than complaining about the officer properly enforcing it. Fouts, along with the city council, have the power to do so. Of course, then people would park on curbs, and someone would likely complain about it requiring a law against it, not to mention the city being deprived of ticker revenue for the offense.

Update: The Macomb County Prosecutor decided to not file any charges in the case - make of that what you will. Certainly would not suggest the prosecutor caved in the face of protests and threats of a riot if the driver was charged - after all the prosecutor said they "employ discretion to not authorize criminal charges as certain circumstances demand.”

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Flamethrowers Give Warren Mayor A Case Of The Flammable Vapors

The knee-jerk desire of people to ban what they do not understand or makes them afraid strikes again.

A couple of companies, including one here in Michigan, advertise the sale of a product, namely a flamethrower, that has been legal for civilians to own since, well, so long as the products have been in existence. The City of Warren's Mayor finds out and gets a case of the flammable vapors and moves to ban them.

The Detroit Free Press: A right to own flamethrowers? Warren mayor wants them banned

Does the mayor have any examples of flamethrower misuse in Warren? Of course not, but better ban them just to be sure.

Curiously enough, and much like a typical gun ban, the proposed legislation exempts:

any officer, employee or member of the Armed Forces, law enforcement, fire department or local, state or federal government who is on duty and acting within the scope of his or her employment.

Well, ok then.

The law as proposed may also be over-broad and include more than what people consider to be flamethrowers. Not that this has stopped anyone before.

And it's not just one mayor alone, Sebastian over at Shall Not Be Questioned points out CNN is also having fits over flamethrowers.

The statist impulse to ban first and only then consider if there's even a problem posed later. Go figure.

Thursday, July 08, 2010

But did the Fortune Tellers predict this regulation was coming?

The Detroit Free Press: Fortune telling in Warren to get harder
The city is on the verge of passing one of the nation's most stringent regulations for fortune-tellers by requiring licenses, fees, fingerprints, criminal background reports and employment histories for anyone who earns money forecasting the future.

If approved by the City Council on Tuesday, as expected, Warren will join a growing number of communities nationwide to crack down on fraudulent fortune-tellers who prey on the vulnerable. Anyone who violates the ordinance would face up to 90 days in jail and a $500 fine.
Of course its an interesting questions as to how you can tell the difference between a fraudulent fortune teller and a bona fide fortune teller.
"By registering them, we know who they are and where they are working, so hopefully it will discourage any non legitimate fortune-tellers from coming to the area," Councilman Keith Sudowski said. "We also need some enforcement in place to regulate this industry and prosecute anyone who preys on innocent people."
Can the councilman explain the difference between a legitimate fortune teller and an illegitimate one?  Can he also show how this new licensing regime will let you tell the two apart?

I can see a disclaimer being required that fortune telling is for novelty purposes only so that the gullible aren't sucked in but how can you tell a legitimate fake from an illegitimate fake in the?

What's next licenses for legitimate astrologers and phrenologists?

Maybe the Warren City counsel should, in addition to the fingerprinting a licensing fees, require these practitioners to have degrees in pseudoscience - that'll credentialize 'em and thus protect the people of Warren quite adequately.

I predict this licensing regime will fail to fulfill its goal of protecting the gullible of Warren, but I do predict it will raise some revenue for the city coffers.  Do I need a license for that?